Crude oil jumped from $65 to over $100 a barrel in a matter of weeks after the US-Israel military strike on Iran on 28 February 2026. Over 200 oil and gas vessels are stuck near the Strait of Hormuz — the narrow waterway that handles 20% of the world's daily oil and gas supply — and insurance companies are refusing to cover ships transiting the area. The unsubsidised market price of RON 95 petrol in Malaysia has hit RM2.67 per litre, but you are still paying RM1.99 thanks to the Budi 95 initiative. The government is absorbing the difference, and the numbers do not work in its favour.
This is not a distant geopolitical event. It is a direct, measurable hit on Malaysia's fiscal position, currency stability, consumer prices, and the investment outlook for anyone with exposure to Bursa, the ringgit, or commodity-linked assets. The Prime Minister himself addressed the nation, saying the government would give "maximum effort to hold off the raising price" — and in the same breath acknowledging "the market is beyond our control."
Understanding the transmission channels — from Hormuz to Putrajaya to your grocery bill — is the starting point for making any financial decision in this environment.
The petrodollar context: why the US struck Iran
The strike did not happen in a vacuum. By the end of 2025, China was importing a record 1.2 billion barrels of oil from Russia, Saudi Arabia, and Venezuela — all paid in yuan, bypassing the US dollar. Iran was supplying roughly one-tenth of China's entire oil needs at discounted prices, making it the anchor of a potential alternative to the petrodollar system that has underpinned global trade since the 1970s. The US moved against Venezuela first (extracting President Maduro in January 2026), then Iran. Over 1,200 munitions were used in the 28 February strike. Iran retaliated against US bases and energy infrastructure. The result: the Strait of Hormuz is now a conflict zone, and global energy markets are in shock.
Malaysia's oil paradox: we produce crude, but we buy fuel
The most common misconception among Malaysians is that higher global oil prices are good for the country because "we have Petronas." The reality is a structural trap.
Malaysia exports crude oil but imports refined fuel — including the RON 95 petrol that 15 million vehicles burn every week. When crude prices spike, two things happen simultaneously:
- Revenue rises modestly. A $10-per-barrel increase earns Malaysia an extra RM2.5 billion to RM3.5 billion from crude exports.
- Subsidy costs rise faster. That same $10 jump costs the government RM3.5 billion to RM5.1 billion in additional fuel subsidy spending to hold RON 95 at RM1.99.
The net effect is negative. Every oil price spike costs the government money, not the reverse.
Petronas dividends reinforce the squeeze. The national oil company's dividend to the government is expected to fall below RM20 billion in 2026, and total national oil revenue is projected at just RM43 billion — a 30% decline from 2025. For context, oil revenue made up 41.3% of government revenue in 2009. By 2026, it will be roughly 12.5%.
The cascade: fuel to food to jobs
If the subsidy becomes fiscally unsustainable, the knock-on effects are predictable and broad:
Food prices. Malaysia imports roughly 90% of its food items, including seeds, fertiliser, and animal feed. Every ringgit increase in shipping and fuel costs feeds directly into supermarket prices — rice, cooking oil, flour, sugar, vegetables. Economists have already projected inflation rising toward 2.2% by year-end, driven almost entirely by food and transport.
Ringgit pressure. In periods of global panic, capital flows out of emerging markets like Malaysia and into safe-haven assets — primarily the US dollar. The ringgit's recent strength at around RM3.95 per USD is under threat. A weaker ringgit makes imports more expensive, which compounds the inflation from higher shipping costs.
Growth downgrade. The IMF has cut Malaysia's 2026 GDP growth projection from 4.6% to 4.3%. Malaysia runs over RM3 trillion in annual trade and exports semiconductors, electronics, and palm oil globally. The US alone accounts for 13% of total exports. Reduced global demand, rising shipping costs, and supply chain disruptions all drag on factory output, hiring, and wages.
The government has responded by diversifying trade routes, increasing ASEAN trade agreements, and encouraging domestic food production. These are structurally sound moves — but structural reforms take years. The price increases arrive in weeks.
Adam Tan — growth lens
The oil spike is a double-edged event for Malaysian equities, and most retail investors are positioned for the wrong edge.
The reflexive reaction — "oil is up, buy Petronas-linked counters" — misses the structural reality above. Petronas's revenue may tick up on crude sales, but the government will extract more from Petronas via special dividends or higher profit-sharing to plug the subsidy hole. That is what happened in every previous oil shock. The company's capex suffers, and its publicly listed subsidiaries (Petronas Chemicals, Petronas Dagangan, Petronas Gas) get caught between higher input costs and government extraction.
Where the opportunity actually sits:
Palm oil is the more interesting play. When crude oil rises, biodiesel economics improve because palm-oil-based biodiesel becomes more price-competitive against fossil diesel. Malaysia is the world's second-largest palm oil producer. Plantation stocks — Sime Darby Plantation, IOI Corp, KLK — have historically outperformed during sustained oil price spikes. If crude stays above $90 for two or more quarters, the biodiesel mandate (B20, potentially B30) creates structural demand.
Exporters with USD revenue benefit from a weaker ringgit. Semiconductor firms (Inari Amertron, ViTrox, Frontken) earn in USD and pay costs in ringgit. If the ringgit weakens past RM4.10, their margins expand mechanically. The same logic applies to glove makers (Hartalega, Top Glove) — though demand dynamics are different from the pandemic era.
What I would avoid: Consumer discretionary stocks and anything levered to domestic spending. If RON 95 subsidy is restructured or partially removed, disposable income contracts across the board. Retailers, F&B chains, and auto dealers would feel it first. Astro, MR DIY, and Padini are names I would not be adding to right now.
The macro setup is clear: rotate toward commodity exporters and USD earners, away from domestic consumption plays. The rotation does not require a crash thesis — it requires the current oil price environment to persist for two to three quarters, which the Strait of Hormuz disruption makes more likely, not less.
Daniel Lim — steady lens
The numbers in this analysis are real, but I want to stress-test the worst-case assumptions before anyone restructures their portfolio around a war scenario.
Three things to keep in perspective:
1. The subsidy has survived spikes before. Malaysia maintained fuel subsidies through the 2008 oil shock ($147/barrel) and the 2022 spike ($120+/barrel). The Budi 95 targeted subsidy was designed to be more fiscally sustainable than the blanket subsidy it replaced. Removing fuel subsidy is politically toxic. PM Anwar's statement was cautious, not definitive.
2. The $100 oil price may not hold. The Strait of Hormuz has been threatened before — during the Iran-Iraq war, the Tanker War, and the 2019 Saudi Aramco drone attacks. Each time, the initial price shock partially reversed within 3-6 months as alternative routes, strategic reserves, and diplomacy opened up. OPEC+ spare capacity (particularly Saudi Arabia and UAE) can partially offset Iranian supply loss.
3. Inflation at 2.2% is uncomfortable, not catastrophic. Bank Negara's target band is 2-3%. The real risk scenario is if oil stays above $100 for 6+ months and the ringgit weakens past RM4.20 simultaneously — that could push inflation toward 3-4%, which would force BNM to consider rate adjustments.
What I would actually do right now:
Keep your emergency fund intact — 3 to 6 months of expenses in a high-yield savings account or short-term FD. If you already have this covered, resist the urge to "trade the war." Most retail investors lose money trying to time geopolitical events because the second-order effects (diplomatic resolution, OPEC response, strategic reserve releases) are unpredictable.
If you hold unit trusts, check whether your fund manager has already adjusted — most institutional managers repositioned toward commodities and defensive sectors in Q1. You may already have some protection without realising it.
For fixed-income investors: if BNM holds rates steady (likely in the near term), existing FD rates of 3.0-3.5% remain reasonable. If BNM raises rates in response to sustained inflation, FD rates will improve — so locking in a very long-term FD today may not be optimal. Stick to 6-12 month tenures until the rate direction is clearer.
Sarah Abdullah — action lens
If you want to assess your personal exposure to this oil shock, here is a practical checklist you can work through this weekend.
Fuel budget impact:
Calculate how much you spend on petrol monthly. If the subsidy is partially removed and RON 95 moves to, say, RM2.30 (a modest adjustment, not full market price), that is a 15.5% increase in your fuel bill. If you currently spend RM400/month on petrol, that becomes RM462 — an extra RM62/month or RM744/year. If it moves to full market price of RM2.67, your RM400 bill becomes RM537 — an extra RM1,644/year.
Grocery buffer:
Track your grocery spending this month and next month. If the total creeps up by more than 5% with no change in what you buy, you are seeing the import cost pass-through in real time. This is your signal to review discretionary spending.
Ringgit exposure check:
If you have any USD-denominated debt (overseas education loans, foreign property mortgages), a weaker ringgit increases your repayment cost directly. Calculate your monthly USD obligations and check what a move from RM3.95 to RM4.20 per USD would mean. For a USD 1,000/month obligation, that is an extra RM250/month.
Investment allocation review:
Pull up your portfolio. Categorise holdings into three buckets:
- Commodity-linked / USD earners (plantations, O&G, semiconductors, gloves) — these benefit from higher oil and weaker ringgit
- Domestic consumption (retail, F&B, property, auto) — these get squeezed by higher costs and lower discretionary spending
- Fixed income / cash (FDs, money market funds, savings accounts) — preservation plays
If more than 50% of your invested assets sit in the domestic consumption bucket, you have concentrated risk in a rising-cost environment. Consider whether a 10-20% shift toward the other buckets makes sense for your risk tolerance.
Debt timing:
If you were planning to take a new loan (car, personal, housing), the next 3-6 months carry elevated uncertainty. This does not mean "never borrow" — it means ensure your debt service ratio can absorb a scenario where your fuel and food costs rise 10-15% simultaneously. Run the numbers before signing.
Source Video
This analysis drew on the following video as a primary source.
Affiliate disclosure: money.com.my may earn a commission if you apply for a product through our links. This does not affect editorial recommendations — products are assessed on published rates and terms.