A Mr Money TV video (16 March 2026) says a Malaysian CEO at a listed company pulls in roughly RM571,000 in base salary, plus an average RM417,000 bonus — nearly RM1 million a year — and that this produces a CEO-to-worker pay ratio of 148:1, against 74:1 in Singapore and 300:1 or higher in the United States. We could not find the dataset behind any of those figures, and they do not add up on their own terms: DOSM's formal-sector median wage for Malaysian citizens was RM2,864 a month in mid-2025 (about RM34,400 a year), and RM988,000 is about 29 times that, not 148. The 148:1 figure therefore has to describe a much better-paid group of executives than the average listed-company CEO. Treat the headline ratio as a claim, not a measurement.
The video also cites specific pay packages at companies it does not name. We could not identify those companies or verify any of the figures, so we have not reproduced them.
The video says an "ERRI" report published in 2026 corroborated findings first surfaced in 2019, and that the gap is not explained by performance. We could not identify or locate that report, so this remains unconfirmed.
Adam Tan — growth lens
The video's central argument is that CEO pay is disconnected from company outcomes. We could not verify any specific case, so treat that as an argument, not a finding.
The video offers examples of raises paid in years of poor results at unnamed listed companies. We could not identify the companies or check the figures against their annual reports, so none are reproduced here; the argument below stands or falls on the mechanism, not on those cases.
CEO pay in the US, at least, is driven by what Warren Buffett mocked in his 2005 shareholder letter: a perpetual ratchet. He wrote that comp committees are "bombarded for a few hours before a board meeting with pay statistics that perpetually ratchet upwards," so that "yesterday's most egregious excess becomes today's baseline." The mechanism he describes is benchmarking against peers: the median rises, the next round of benchmarking starts higher, and pay climbs not because of performance improvement but because everyone agreed to pay above the average they just created. Whether Malaysian boards follow the same pattern is our inference, not something the video or Buffett shows.
There is a legitimate counter-argument. The CEO role has genuinely grown harder. A CEO of a Bursa-listed conglomerate today navigates global supply chains, currency fluctuation, regulatory complexity across multiple jurisdictions, and shareholders who can exit positions in milliseconds. The talent pool for proven CEOs who can steer that complexity is finite and globally contested. Malaysian companies compete for the same candidates as firms in Singapore, Hong Kong, London, and New York. If a regional CEO in Southeast Asia commands USD 2 million a year, a Malaysian conglomerate either matches it or watches that candidate walk.
But acknowledging that doesn't, on its own, explain the video's allegation that pay rises even when results fall. A ratchet mechanism could. And until Malaysian regulators require transparent, performance-linked disclosure of executive compensation — tying pay to specific metrics with consequences for missing them — the upward-only escalator will keep running.
What to watch: Whether Bursa Malaysia's corporate governance reforms introduce mandatory CEO pay-for-performance disclosure in 2026-2027. Any movement toward Singapore-style structured reporting would be the first real check on the ratchet.
Daniel Lim — steady lens
If the video's 148:1 ratio is right, it isn't primarily a corporate governance failure. It's a structural economic outcome — and understanding the structure matters more than being angry at the number.
Malaysia's growth model was built on low-cost, labour-intensive industry: palm oil, rubber, cheap electronics assembly. These sectors compete globally by keeping costs low. They do not generate enough value per worker to distribute higher wages. You cannot squeeze water from a stone, and you cannot pay RM5,000 salaries in an industry where the entire value chain is optimised for RM2,800 workers.
Singapore made a different bet. In the 1970s and 1980s — when the Ringgit and Singapore Dollar were roughly at parity — Singapore pivoted to high-value industries: finance, biomedical research, advanced technology. These sectors demand skilled workers and generate the surplus that sustains higher absolute wages. That is the core reason, in the video's telling, that Singapore's CEO-to-worker ratio sits at 74:1 (a figure we could not verify). It is not that Singaporean CEOs are paid less in absolute terms. It is that Singaporean workers are paid substantially more.
The divergence took 40 years to build. It will not close in one election cycle.
The video describes Malaysia's progressive wage policy as voluntary (we could not verify this from a Ministry of Human Resources source). Singapore's Progressive Wage Model, by contrast, sets structured pay steps for named sectors such as cleaning, security and landscape, according to its Ministry of Manpower. Malaysia raised the minimum wage to RM1,700 in February 2025 (the Minimum Wages Order 2024), and some businesses have argued — with some validity — that higher costs could force closures in low-margin industries.
This is the middle-income trap in action. The economy is too fragile to absorb modest wage increases, yet too dependent on low-cost labour to generate the value that would make higher wages sustainable. Breaking out requires education reform (a generational timeline), investment incentives for higher-value sectors (a decade-long build), and political courage to absorb the short-term pain of factory closures and transitional unemployment.
The hard truth is that politicians who bet on economic upgrading risk their seats. The beneficiaries of structural reform arrive 10-15 years after the vote is cast. The workers who lose jobs during the transition vote in the next election.
The question to ask yourself: Are you building your career and savings plan around the assumption that Malaysian wages will rise meaningfully in the next five years? The structural data says otherwise. Plan for wage growth that trails inflation, and invest the gap.
Sarah Abdullah — action lens
Whatever the true CEO-to-worker ratio, wage inequality is a systemic problem. You cannot fix it individually. But you can make decisions that reduce its impact on your financial life.
Step 1: Know your actual position. Check where your salary sits against the national median. DOSM's formal-sector median wage for Malaysian citizens was RM2,864 a month in the second and third quarters of 2025 (about RM34,400 a year). Its annual Salaries & Wages Survey, a different series, puts the 2025 median at RM2,940. If you're near this level, your priority is reducing debt exposure, not chasing investment returns.
Step 2: Audit your household debt. Malaysian household debt stood at RM1,716 billion at end-December 2025 — 84.8% of GDP, according to Bank Negara Malaysia's Financial Stability Review (2H 2025). Credit cards account for 3.0% of that debt (roughly RM51 billion on our arithmetic). Outstanding BNPL debt was RM4.9 billion, with BNPL transactions worth RM11.9 billion in the second half of 2025 alone; BNM puts overdue BNPL debt at 3.2% of the total. If you're using BNPL for necessities and missing payment deadlines, the "0% interest" promise evaporates and the debt compounds.
Action: Open every BNPL app you use. Total up outstanding balances. If the combined figure exceeds one month's salary, pause all new BNPL purchases until the balance clears.
Step 3: Calculate your real cost of living vs income. Between 2019 and 2025 the DOSM annual median wage rose from RM2,442 to RM2,940 (2020 is a COVID-affected low of RM2,076); whether your own food and housing costs rose faster is what this step tests. A family earning RM3,000/month may find that basic necessities — rent, food, transport, utilities — consume 90% or more of income. Write down last month's actual spending across these four categories. If the number leaves less than RM300 in breathing room, your financial position is fragile regardless of what GDP growth headlines say.
Step 4: Evaluate the Singapore option honestly. Many Malaysians work across the causeway (we have no primary headcount). The income arbitrage can be real — Singaporean wages for equivalent roles are often much higher in Ringgit terms. But the costs are also real: accommodation, transport, time away from family, and the JB-Singapore commute grind. If you're considering this, calculate the net gain after all costs, not just the gross salary.
Step 5: Build skills that move you into higher-value sectors. Malaysia's low-wage trap is concentrated in specific industries. Tech, finance, professional services, and healthcare pay materially above the median. Free or subsidised upskilling through HRD Corp-claimable programmes, MDEC's digital skills initiatives, or platforms like Coursera and Google Career Certificates can shift your trajectory over 12-24 months without requiring a full degree.
Common mistake: Assuming GDP growth means your wages will rise. Malaysia's GDP growth has been "robust" on paper for years. The median worker has not felt it. National growth statistics measure aggregate output, not wage distribution. Make decisions based on your payslip, not the headlines.
Source Video
This analysis drew on the following video as a primary source.
Affiliate disclosure: money.com.my may earn a commission if you apply for a product through our links. This does not affect editorial recommendations — products are assessed on published rates and terms.
Amendment, 17 October 2026. This piece's headline and opening treated a 148:1 CEO-to-worker ratio as established fact. We could not find a primary source for it, for the Singapore (74:1) and US (300:1) comparisons, or for the RM571,000 base salary and RM417,000 bonus, and the opening arithmetic did not work: RM988,000 is about 29 times DOSM's formal-sector median wage, not 148. The title, description and opening now present these as the video's claims, and the body's statements that build on the 148:1 figure are worded conditionally. Removed: two 2018 pay cases and two director-pay figures for companies the video described but did not name, which we could not verify from the companies' own reports, together with the "1,484 years" calculation that depended on one of them. The "ERRI" report remains the video's unconfirmed claim. Wage data: the original RM2,864 median is correct for DOSM's Employee Wages Statistics (Formal Sector) for Q2 and Q3 2025 ("increased by 4.3 per cent to RM2,864"); an earlier draft of this amendment wrongly said it was absent from DOSM's data, because it looked only at the annual Salaries & Wages Survey, which gives RM2,940 for 2025 and RM2,442 for 2019 (RM2,076 for 2020, a COVID low). Only the "RM36,000 a year" conversion was wrong (RM2,864 x 12 is about RM34,400). Other corrections: the Buffett "ratchet" passage is in his 2005 letter, not 2006, and does not mention the 75th or 90th percentile; household debt was RM1,716 billion and 84.8% of GDP at end-December 2025 (BNM), not RM1.53 trillion and 84.2%; the RM38.7 billion credit card and "115% BNPL surge, RM16 billion in 2023" figures are replaced with BNM's published numbers; the minimum wage of RM1,700 from February 2025 was confirmed. Unsupported and softened: the claim that Malaysia's progressive wage policy is voluntary and Singapore's mandatory, the "over one million" Malaysians working in Singapore and the 2-3x wage multiple, and the statement that food and housing costs outpaced wages. Evidence is in docs/verification-log/evidence-batch-f1-oct17/.